跳到主要内容

在盔甲下起诉“模仿”标志的热身..。但它们真的有那么相似吗?

+$Under Armour has accused fellow sportswear company, Hotsuit, of trademark infringement. According to Under Armour, weight-loss and sauna suit brand Hotsuit is selling too-similar clothing stamped with a logo that's a copycat of the trademark UA design.

+$The lawsuit claims that the design "has already caused confusion and gives Defendant an unfair boost in the marketplace at the expense of both Under Armour and consumers". Under Armour is seeking a jury trial and an injunction that will order Hotsuit to stop using the logo.

+$But is this case justified? Is the标志设计+$really similar enough to cause confusion? Let's have a look.

+$(Image credit: Under Armour / Hotsuit)

+$There's no doubt that the basic shape very similar, but the flowing lines and loop of the UA logo sets a very different tone to the blocky pointed corners of the H. The use of negative space in the H+$feel reminiscent of the UA, but inverted – with UA's central block cut out and the middle join of the H filled in. The middle part being such a feature on both is part of what gives such a similar impression. But, it kinda just looks like an H. As you would expect from a brand called Hotsuit.

+$Opinions are mixed on the subject, with some pointing out that the context matters:

+$We do see what he means. The fact that the brands share a space in the apparel arena makes for more confusion than if they were in different sectors, as the picture below demonstrates.

Under Armour

+$When in context, the designs+$look similar, but do you need to squint to see it?+$(Image credit: Under Armour/Hotsuit)

+$But others still think think it's a real stretch, commenting that you need to squint from a distance to confuse the two. Others have, amusingly, suggested other brands that Under Armour might want to take on:

+$And logos that are even more similar to Hotsuit have also been shared.

+$The diverse reaction shows just how much grey area there is when dealing with infringement cases. Under Armour, though, is convinced that the design is a real threat to the brand.

+$“Since 1996, we have worked hard to deliver great product and build Under Armour into the strong, global brand that we are today,” the company asserted in a+$statement To WJZ+$. “We have an obligation to enforce our rights against similar marks and prevent any confusion in the marketplace.”

Under armour

+$An image from the court filing+$(Image credit: U.S. District Court filings)

+$We guess we'll wait and see what happens with Under Armour and Hotsuit, but we don't envy the folk having to make the decision. Will it go down in history as one of the many+$high-profile cases of plagiarism+$or is it too much of a stretch?

阅读更多:



翻译字数超限